Mental Health and Substance Abuse

I'm seeing a trend of interest in integrating mental health and substance abuse services-- and I'm seeing some implications in the way agencies are approaching the idea.

By "a trend" I mean that it has come up three times in the last couple of weeks.

Talking with a potential customer a few weeks ago I asked about their project ideas. I look for ideas that galvanize key partners, meet a key need, and involve revenue generation. One of their key priorities was to figure out a way to integrate mental health and substance abuse services in a way that makes more sense for clients, makes more sense in terms of efficiency, and looks forward to a time beyond block grants, to a reimbursement model.

To me, this sounds like a great fit for a business plan: priority need, committed partners, revenue generation required.

One week later, I got an email from a Management Academy grad from several years back. They had just received HRSA funding for their business plan, doing similar work in rural Nebraska.

Last week, a group from Maryland presented their final business plan on the same topic. The team really impressed us with their commitment to see the change through, because they really believe that they can provide measurably better care and deliver better outcomes, and also create measurable administrative efficiencies, by doing the hard work of integrating. They are committed to this path even though the reimbursement picture is foggy at best. No one is sure how this work will get compensated. The only certainty seems to be that the funding model will be changing often, and perhaps dramatically, at least for the next couple of years.

You can't plan for everything. It certainly puts you way ahead of the curve to have planned for what you can plan for, though. These teams are being proactive. They are moving with purpose toward a better future state. And they are preparing themselves, as part of their plan, for uncertainty on the revenue side of the equation.

--Stephen Orton

On The Road in North Platte

A week or two after launching four new groups in North Platte I'm still thinking about the amazing public health system in Nebraska.

The four teams we are working with from north central Nebraska are all rural. Very rural. In fact they would tell you that they don't have enough population to count as rural: most of their counties are "frontier," a few with densities of less than one person per square mile. The health districts themselves have only been around for ten years. The state used tobacco settlement money to establish public health infrastructure.

The teams are working on great public health prevention issues: restaurant inspections (a role not in the public health portfolio in some areas), dental sealants for kids, healthy workplace products, sustainable plans for distributing vaccinations (flu and whatever comes next).

In all four cases they are working hard to find the sustainable revenue stream to support their work over the long haul.

One more thing they all share: great partnerships. Before there were health districts, many of these rural areas had health coalitions of health-conscious partners. As a result, the health leaders in these areas all think very deeply about how to engage and empower their partners. And the partners respond.

To me, the trip it felt like a glimpse at the origins of public health agencies: energy and green shoots and wide-open spaces for the community service mission to express itself.

--Stephen Orton